Skip to main content
Cierre Módulo Soacha

We're Bringing the Teaching for Equity Module to Soacha

In partnership with the Soacha Department of Education, we held the Teaching for Equity Workshop for the first time outside of Bogotá. Teachers from various subject areas shared their experiences and developed proposals to address inequalities through their own teaching practices.

Cierre Módulo Soacha

From August 21 to September 18, 2026, we conducted the TREES Teaching for Equity Module in Soacha, in partnership with the municipality’s Department of Education. Over the course of five sessions, 23 teachers from various subject areas shared experiences and developed proposals to integrate equity into their daily classroom practices.

The module is part of the TREES Community of Practice, a forum for educators interested in reflecting on equity and transforming their teaching practices. This edition brought together teachers from subjects such as mathematics, social studies, physical education, and English. This diversity made it possible to explore different ways of addressing these topics based on the needs of each educational context.

As Andrés Bautista, coordinator of the TREES Community of Practice, explained, issues related to equity and inequalities “are not limited to a single discipline.” Participants recognize that they can address these issues in their classes, “in addition to developing the disciplinary understandings specific to each of their fields.”.

To achieve this, the module offers a process of training and reflection in which participants develop a plan for their own classrooms. With support from the TREES team and feedback from their colleagues, they define what they want their students to understand, design activities to achieve those goals, and propose strategies for assessing learning. Peer exchange allows participants to review the proposals and learn from the experiences of other teachers.

Check out the Video coverage of the module's closure.

For Gisela Rodríguez, a math teacher at the Paz y Esperanza School, this process meant connecting an idea she perceived as abstract to the situations she faces in her work. “I was able to relate it more closely to my reality as a teacher, to the reality of my students, and also to my teaching practices,” she explained.

That reflection includes everyday decisions such as asking students how they are doing, whether they had breakfast, or how they got to school from home. Recognizing those circumstances, she noted, can change the way teachers approach what happens in the classroom and support their students’ learning.

During the closing session, participants presented posters featuring their teaching designs and their own definitions of equity. According to Bautista, the purpose of the work carried out was “to think about better ways to talk, teach, and discuss equity, inequality, and social justice in the classroom.” The proposals showcased different ways to connect these reflections with their students’ experiences.

Gisela, for example, proposed using chess—a game that sparks interest at her school—to explore the differences and needs of her classmates. By drawing on the various moves and possibilities of the pieces, she aims to help her students reflect on the perspectives from which they participate and the ways they can respond to those differences. The proposal also reflects her interest in promoting the participation of a student with a cognitive disability.

For her part, Vilma del Carmen Salcedo Muñoz, a social studies teacher who works with sixth- and seventh-grade students in District 4 of Soacha, focused her proposal on promoting empathy, solidarity, and recognition of classmates who need support to participate in classroom activities.

Vilma explained that she had already put her proposal into practice with seventh-grade students. For her, the process allowed her to connect her knowledge of equity with a specific need at her school: “In theoretical terms, I understood it very clearly, but I hadn’t adapted it to a real-world situation and an educational need.”.

The work of Diana Solis, a professor of Political Science and Economics, focused on recognizing one’s own rights and those of others. Her approach aims to help students connect these reflections to what happens in the classroom, at home, and in their community. Exchanging ideas with other teachers allowed her to expand the tools she uses to address these topics: “I want to build from a practical perspective, from a teaching perspective, through play, and by putting the child at the center.”.

The shared experiences also sparked reflection on the scope of this training. Ángela Peña Díaz, Improvement Leader in the Educational Quality Division of the Soacha Department of Education, noted that teachers developed their own definitions of equity and devised ways to address these concepts with their students, taking into account the different contexts of their schools.

See more Photos of the Soacha Module.

For Peña, one of the challenges is to ensure that these reflections translate into practices that help reduce inequalities and enable students to recognize the conditions in which they live, grow up, and study, as well as their potential to transform their environment.

The exchange also broadened the TREES team’s perspective. For Bautista, it was an opportunity to rethink equity and educational equity “from the perspective of schools and teachers” pedagogical practices” and from their diverse disciplinary perspectives.

This first experience with the Module outside of Bogotá allowed us to continue developing an approach to teaching for equity together with the teachers. Their proposals show how this reflection can take shape in a math class, an inclusion activity, or a conversation about rights, based on what each teacher knows about their students and learns from their colleagues.

If you're interested in sharing experiences and continuing to explore these questions with other teachers, we invite you to join the TREES Community of Practice and stay tuned for upcoming announcements about our training opportunities.

TREES Teaching Module: What Does It Mean to Teach with Equity?

Closing Session of the 2026 Teaching for Equity Module.

Teaching for equity is not just about incorporating new content into the classroom. It also involves reviewing one’s own teaching practices, learning from others’ experiences, and collaborating with fellow teachers to, new ways of understanding and addressing inequalities. It was under this premise that the TREE Teaching ModuleS, a training program certified by the Office of Continuing Education at the Universidad de los Andes that brings together teachers from different educational levels to rethink how equity can become a guiding principle throughout education.

Rather than simply providing educational tools, the module offers a peer-learning experience. Through a Community of Practice, teachers from schools, universities, and other educational settings exchange experiences, reflect on their own methodologies, and design curriculum proposals aimed at strengthening a critical and ethical approach to teaching about equity.

Inspired by the approach of Teaching for Understanding From Harvard University's Project Zero, the module invites you to to view teaching as a process of transformation. This is reflected in the module’s structure: the first session addresses teaching for equity; the second focuses on comprehension goals and performance; the third is dedicated to designing instructional sequences with an equity perspective; the fourth explores strategies for assessing learning from an equity perspective; and the fifth focuses on the presentation and evaluation of curriculum designs. However, the main learning does not arise solely from the content, but rather from the conversations that develop among teachers with different backgrounds, disciplines, and contexts.

Closing Session of the "Teaching for Equity 2025" Module.

The first edition brought together 21 teachers from various educational institutions. Over the course of five sessions, dialogue and feedback helped broaden the perspectives through which each participant understood their own teaching practice. To Lorena Suárez, a professor of Government and Public Policy at Los Nogales School, said that one of the module’s greatest benefits was precisely the opportunity to learn from other educational contexts.

“This space offered me multiple perspectives on education. It was very enriching to receive feedback from colleagues in other contexts. It helped me see the challenges involved in teaching to overcome inequalities and the importance of doing so among peers, with openness and dialogue.”

Her experience reflects one of the guiding principles of the module: equity is also fostered when teachers find opportunities to listen, discuss, and collectively enrich their practices. As she put it, Johanna Gómez, a professor at the Pontificia Universidad Javeriana,

“Stepping away from the university environment for a bit allowed me to see other ways of teaching and other areas of knowledge. Meeting high school teachers helped me broaden my perspective, recognize other voices, and enrich my own practice through diversity.”

This diversity of perspectives was further strengthened during the second edition, held in 2026, in which the following participated: 43 teachers from different educational levels and contexts. The presence of teachers from elementary, middle, and higher education turned the workshop into a space where diverse experiences were discussed and complemented one another, allowing the questions and challenges of some to enrich the reflections of others.

The module’s conclusion highlighted this collective effort. Each participant presented, in poster format, a pedagogical proposal developed throughout the process and received feedback from the other teachers to strengthen it. More than just a presentation of results, this exercise became a space for dialogue where each proposal received feedback thanks to this community.

Check out the highlight reel from the last session of the module:

The activities carried out demonstrated how equity can be addressed from multiple disciplines and contexts. Hyca – Diana Apolá López Bojacá, an arts educator at Menstrure, designed Biodiversity and Cycles, a project that uses medicinal plants to reflect on care” ”It's precisely about how we can use plants and how this can also enable us to propagate them so that we can gain greater autonomy when it comes to our health and the use of medicinal plants."

From another perspective, Sebastián García, a historian and social sciences professor, presented Pork Rinds in Colombia, an activity designed to encourage reflection on agricultural inequalities and the historical challenges of land distribution in the country.

Although the topics were different, both proposals shared the same goal: to translate equity into concrete learning experiences in the classroom. As Sebastián García pointed out, the module demonstrated that “Through collective efforts, we can develop solutions to transform common problems.”.

Beyond the educational resources it produced, the TREES Teaching Module fostered a community of teachers committed to transforming education through reflection, active listening, and collaborative work. By bringing together voices from different regions, disciplines, and educational levels, the module demonstrated that Teaching for equity is not an individual task, but a practice that is strengthened when it is built collectively.

TREES Challenge: researching with communities transforms the way we understand inequalities

The TREES Challenge: Revealing Classism (2024-2025) brought together 120 undergraduate and master's students from different disciplines and from eight departments of the country in an immersive and collaborative experience aimed at designing strategies to strengthen social cohesion. Through participatory research methodologies, the teams explored attitudes, perceptions and practices related to classism in everyday contexts.

In-Person Meeting for TREES Challenge Participants (2024–2025)

More than an academic exercise, the challenge opened a space to connect research, critical and ethical thinking and collective work. Rather than viewing communities as objects of study, the participatory research methodology promoted processes of dialogue and co-creation in which the people involved were able to reflect on classist attitudes and how they reproduce inequalities.

For Irma Flores, associate professor at the Faculty of Education of the Universidad de los Andes, one of the main contributions of this approach is that it allows “not only to bring a topic such as classism to a community, but also to talk to that community to see what they understand by classism”. From this perspective, participatory research not only produces knowledge: it also strengthens the social fabric and creates more horizontal relationships between researchers and communities.

Watch the reel and find out why participatory research was key to #RetoTREES

The challenge was aimed especially at students in training, precisely because this academic moment can open spaces for critical exploration and interdisciplinary creativity. As Paula Jaramillo, TREES teaching leader, points out, it is “a moment in life in which they can perceive the classisms around them and try not to reproduce them and also do something about them”.

The challenge was developed in six phases that guided the teams in the design and implementation of participatory action research in their own environments. Throughout the process, students identified and critically analyzed attitudes, relationships, perceptions and practices that reproduce - or challenge - dynamics of classism in everyday life. For the two editions of the Challenge, 2024 and 2025, the last phase culminated in a face-to-face meeting at the Universidad de los Andes, where the teams shared their findings, discussed their methodologies and reflected collectively.

Beyond presenting results, the final meeting allowed students to connect their practical experience with theoretical, methodological, and ethical discussions on how to conduct research alongside communities. As Blas Zubiría Mutis, a mentor from the Universidad del Atlántico, stated during the 2024 meeting, the process allowed participants to “engage in a concrete research experience, using parameters established by TREES and linking them to theoretical, methodological, and epistemological reflection on participatory research.” In the first edition of the Challenge, teams from the Universidad del Norte, the Universidad del Atlántico, El Colegio de México, and the Universidad de los Andes developed research questions, designed methodologies, and evaluated—together with the communities—whether this type of research was meaningful and useful to those participating in it.

TREES 2025 Challenge certificate delivery.

The projects developed during the challenge also showed how classism manifests itself in everyday scenarios. One of the teams from the Universidad del Atlántico investigated dynamics of classism and microclassism in Alameda del Río, an urban housing project that brings together people from different socioeconomic contexts. Through observation, interviews and surveys, the team identified how everyday practices - such as drying clothes in windows or the presence of street vendors - generate tensions related to social status and perceptions of exclusivity.

The research showed how certain prejudices, towards informal activities and ways of inhabiting the space, reflect stereotypes and class barriers that generate tensions in coexistence. Beyond identifying these dynamics, the process allowed us to open conversations with the community about the ways in which these practices affect relations between neighbors and the perception of the “other” within the same territory. “Through surveys and interviews, we collected perceptions of exclusivity and prejudice towards informal activities such as street vending. These results will allow us to propose mitigation measures and foster understanding of classist attitudes,” explained Andrés Eduardo Miranda Pacheco, challenge participant and member of the #SOMOSUA team.

d data-instgrm-permalink=”https://www.instagram.com/p/DKIZhYmz23v/?utm_source=ig_embed&utm_campaign=loading” data-instgrm-version=”14″ style=” background:#FFF; border:0; border-radius:3px; box-shadow:0 0 0 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0,0.5),0 1px 10px 10px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0,0.15); margin: 1px; max-width:540px; min-width:326px; padding:0; width:99.375%; width:-webkit-calc(100% - 2px); width:calc(100% - 2px);”>

The Alameda del Río project showed how the challenge not only sought to produce data on classism, but also to generate processes of listening and collective reflection. This same logic ran through other projects of the TREES 2024 Challenge, such as the one developed by the SINPREJUICIOS team, which investigated the dynamics of classism in a beauty salon in Bogota. Through interviews and observation, the team identified how class differences between employees and clients produce derogatory attitudes towards workers.

“We discovered that personal attention, talking to the client, is considered an ‘implicit service’ that affects less talkative employees. We also found xenophobia and gender preferences among the stylists,” explained María Fernanda Blanco, a participant in the SINPREJUICIOS team. For the members of the project, one of the main lessons learned from the challenge was to understand the importance of humanizing people in the research and not seeing them only as data.

In addition, the Challenge served as a space for building networks among students from multiple regions and socioeconomic contexts, strengthening ties and collective learning. Valentina Gutiérrez, a student at Universidad de la Sabana, talks about what it meant to her to participate in the TREES 2025 Challenge.

“In this experience I understood the importance of each discipline, because each one brings a different look that enriches and transforms the way we understand reality. The most important teaching is that we must constantly challenge ourselves and question what attitudes or behaviors may be replicating classism, even when we are not fully aware of it.”

This reflection was also echoed in the experience of Verónica Rumaña Moreno, a student at the Universidad de los Andes and member of the team. Sentipensante Fabric. For her, one of the main lessons learned was to understand that classism does not always manifest itself in an obvious way. “Discriminatory behaviors are not necessarily expressed explicitly; many times they appear in subtle actions that have a profound impact on people,” she said.

data-instgrm-permalink=”https://www.instagram.com/p/DCC24D4TTNu/?utm_source=ig_embed&utm_campaign=loading” data-instgrm-version=”14″ style=” background:#FFF; border:0; border-radius:3px; box-shadow:0 0 0 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0,0.5),0 1px 10px 10px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0,0.15); margin: 1px; max-width:540px; min-width:326px; padding:0; width:99.375%; width:-webkit-calc(100% - 2px); width:calc(100% - 2px);”>

The teams' findings also revealed a major challenge: classism is often deeply normalized in everyday interactions, which makes it difficult to identify, investigate and even name. This is why the participatory research methodology takes on greater importance in the TREES Challenge, as it allows for the opening of spaces for listening and dialogue, and for the communities themselves to name and identify classism in their environments.

For more than five months, students not only develop research on different expressions of classism in their immediate environments, but also explore concrete ways to recognize and mitigate these attitudes that create inequality gaps in everyday life.

Watch here the TREES 2024 CHALLENGE coverage reel