Skip to main content

TREES Teaching Module: What Does It Mean to Teach with Equity?

Sesión de cierre Módulo de Enseñanza para la equidad 2026.

Enseñar para la equidad no consiste únicamente en incorporar nuevos contenidos al aula. También implica revisar las prácticas pedagógicas propias, escuchar otras experiencias y construir, junto a otros docentes, nuevas maneras de comprender y enfrentar las desigualdades. Bajo esta premisa nació el Módulo de Enseñanza TREES, un espacio de formación certificado por la Dirección de Educación Continua de la Universidad de los Andes que reúne a docentes de distintos niveles educativos para repensar cómo la equidad puede convertirse en un principio que atraviese la enseñanza.

Más que ofrecer herramientas pedagógicas, el módulo propone una experiencia de aprendizaje entre pares. A través de una la Community of Practice, profesores de colegios, universidades y otros espacios educativos intercambian experiencias, cuestionan sus propias metodologías y diseñan propuestas curriculares orientadas a fortalecer una enseñanza crítica y ética de la equidad.

Inspirado en el enfoque de Teaching for Understanding del Proyecto Zero de la Universidad de Harvard, el módulo invita a comprender la enseñanza como un proceso de transformación. Esto se refleja en la estructura del módulo: la primera sesión aborda la enseñanza para la equidad; la segunda se centra en las metas de comprensión y los desempeños; la tercera está dedicada al diseño de secuencias didácticas con perspectiva de equidad; la cuarta explora estrategias de evaluación del aprendizaje desde una perspectiva de equidad; y la quinta se enfoca en la presentación y evaluación de diseños curriculares. Sin embargo, el principal aprendizaje no surge únicamente de los contenidos, sino de las conversaciones que se construyen entre docentes con trayectorias, disciplinas y contextos distintos.

Sesión de cierre Módulo de Enseñanza para la equidad 2025.

La primera edición reunió a 21 docentes provenientes de diferentes instituciones educativas. Durante cinco sesiones, el diálogo y la retroalimentación permitieron ampliar las perspectivas desde las cuales cada participante comprendía su propia práctica docente. Para Lorena Suárez, profesora de Gobierno y Políticas Públicas del Colegio Los Nogales, uno de los mayores aportes del módulo fue precisamente la posibilidad de aprender de otros contextos educativos.

“Este espacio me ofreció múltiples miradas sobre lo educativo. Fue muy enriquecedor recibir retroalimentación de colegas de otros contextos. Me ayudó a ver los retos que implica enseñar para superar desigualdades y la importancia de hacerlo entre pares, con apertura y diálogo.”

Su experiencia refleja uno de los principios que orientan el módulo: la equidad también se construye cuando los docentes encuentran espacios para escuchar, debatir y enriquecer colectivamente sus prácticas. Como expresó Johanna Gómez, docente de la Pontificia Universidad Javeriana,

“Salir un poco del ambiente universitario me permitió ver otras formas de enseñar y otros conocimientos. Encontrarme con profes de colegio me ayudó a ampliar la mirada, a reconocer otras voces y a enriquecer mi propia práctica desde lo diverso.”

Esta diversidad de perspectivas se fortaleció aún más durante la segunda edición, realizada en 2026, en la que participaron 43 docentes de distintos niveles y contextos educativos. La presencia de profesores de educación básica, media y superior convirtió el módulo en un espacio donde distintas experiencias dialogaron y se complementaron, permitiendo que las preguntas y desafíos de unos enriquecieran las reflexiones de otros.

El cierre del módulo evidenció esa construcción colectiva. Cada participante presentó, en formato póster, una propuesta pedagógica diseñada a lo largo del proceso y recibió comentarios de los demás docentes para fortalecerla. Más que una presentación de resultados, este ejercicio se convirtió en un espacio de diálogo donde cada propuesta fue retroalimentada por gracias a esta comunidad.

Mira el reel de cubrimiento de lla última sesión del Módulo:

Las actividades desarrolladas mostraron cómo la equidad puede abordarse desde múltiples disciplinas y contextos. Hyca – Diana Apolá López Bojacá, pedagoga artística de Menstrure, diseñó Biodiversidad y ciclos, una propuesta que utiliza las plantas medicinales para reflexionar sobre el cuidado” trata justamente de como podemos usar las plantas y como esto también puede generar que las podamos reproducir para que cada vez tengamos mayor soberanía en relación a la salud y al uso de las plantas medicinales”

Desde otra perspectiva, Sebastián García, historiador y docente de ciencias sociales, presentó El chicharrón de la tierra en Colombia, una actividad orientada a promover la reflexión sobre las desigualdades agrarias y los retos históricos de la distribución de la tierra en el país.

Aunque los temas eran diferentes, ambas propuestas compartían un mismo propósito: traducir la equidad en experiencias concretas de aprendizaje dentro del aula. Como señaló Sebastián García, el módulo demostró que “desde las construcciones colectivas podemos edificar soluciones para transformar problemas comunes”.

Más allá de los recursos pedagógicos producidos, el Módulo de Enseñanza TREES consolidó una comunidad de docentes comprometida con transformar la educación desde la reflexión, la escucha y el trabajo colaborativo. Al reunir voces provenientes de distintos territorios, disciplinas y niveles educativos el módulo mostró que enseñar para la equidad no es una tarea individual, sino una práctica que se fortalece cuando se construye colectivamente.

Caring, nurturing and getting ahead: inequality begins in childhood 

Does inequality begin before we can decide about our own lives?

In the second episode of The game of life, TREES' videopodcast and the documentary film directed by Andrés Ruiz Zuluaga, we talk about motherhood, caregiving, teenage pregnancy and the inequalities that begin to mark life from early childhood.

Together with Raquel Bernal, rector of the Universidad de los Andes and an expert in early childhood, and Andrés Moya, director of Seeds of Attachment, Leopoldo Fergusson, co-director of TREES, and Andrés Ruiz Zuluaga reflect on the women who support entire families, the invisible burden of caregiving and how opportunities - or their absence - begin to shape the future from the earliest years of life.

From the stories of The game of life, This episode explores how social inequalities permeate motherhood and parenting: from teenage pregnancy and the absence of support networks, to the economic, emotional and cultural barriers that millions of women face in caring for and raising their children.

The conversation also addresses the role of the first years of life in children's development, how early experiences impact the future and why talking about early childhood is also talking about poverty, gender, violence and social mobility.

In this episode

  • Why does inequality start from the earliest years of life?
  • Maternity, care and poverty in Colombia
  • Teenage pregnancy and inequality traps
  • Women who support entire families
  • What happens when parenting depends almost exclusively on mothers?
  • Early childhood, violence and life opportunities
  • How experiences from 0 to 6 years of age shape the future
  • The stories behind the inequality data
  • The invisible burden of care and gender gaps
  • What would have to change in order to grow up in a more equitable country?

Watch or listen to the full episode

📌 New episodes coming soon.

When not everyone counts the same: Why inequality is not just in the checkbook?

Inequality is not only reflected in income. It also appears in how we are valued, perceived and heard. In this masterclass, Leopoldo Fergusson, full professor at the School of Economics of the Universidad de los Andes and co-founder of TREES, argues that the most essential equality, the one that matters more than inequality of opportunities or outcomes, is that of being treated with equal consideration as members of a political community. Using everyday examples and research findings, he discusses the expressions of this type of inequality in Colombia, its historical and cultural roots, and the opportunities we have to overcome it.

The session is presented by Jhon Quinchua and was part of Pensar en Voz Alta, the Icesi University Festival, which brought together open conversations on the future of democracy, the inequalities that permeate society and the impact of artificial intelligence.

The game of life: a videopodcast to discuss inequality, social mobility and Colombia

What really determines the opportunities we have in life? How do the place where we are born, the relationships we build, and the barriers—both visible and invisible—influence our life paths?

From the film The game of life*, we are launching a new video podcast that sparks conversations about inequality, social mobility, early childhood, classism, education, privilege, and territorial issues in Colombia.

In each episode, Leopoldo Fergusson—professor of economics and co-director of TREES— and Andrés Ruiz—Director of Communications at Uniandes and director of the film—talk with researchers, teachers, artists, and individuals with diverse life experiences to explore how inequalities permeate daily life and shape people’s opportunities.

The podcast takes as its point of departure the real stories portrayed in the documentary film The game of life, a film made over the course of more than 14 years that follows the lives of Colombian families in different parts of the country. Drawing on these stories, the conversations bring together personal experiences, research, and film to reflect on the many dimensions of inequality.

The videopodcast of The game of life seeks to create a space to think about the country from different perspectives and open conversations that often remain outside the public debate.

*The film is based on the research of the Colombian Longitudinal Survey (ELCA) of the School of Economics at the Universidad de los Andes. The ELCA followed 10,000 families for more than a decade to better understand the dynamics of poverty and inequality in Colombia.

🎧 Watch or listen The game of life videopodcast on all platforms:

Check out the first six episodes:

A production by El juego de la vida and TREES, an initiative of the Universidad de los Andes that conducts research, teaches, and raises awareness to influence public discourse on inequality. 

📌 New episodes every week.

We hosted the second Political Economy of the Global South Conference (PEGS) in Bogota, Colombia. 

On March 16 and 17, we held the second edition of the Political Economy of the Global South Conference (PEGS) at the Universidad de los Andes.  

The meeting brought together academics and international experts in sessions on extractivism, inequality, informality, global fragmentation and international trade, as well as in discussions on new forms of cooperation in the face of the challenges of ecological transition and sustainable development. 

These sessions sought to answer a fundamental question that, as Jimena Hurtado, Vice Rector for Research and Creation at the Universidad de los Andes and co-founder of TREES, put it: “How can we understand an economy that does not work for everyone in countries where inequality is not a figure but a daily reality?. 

From this perspective, the conference also sought to generate exchanges between countries of the global south that share histories of violence and the search for ways to transform them, with a potential that goes beyond academic dialogue. In Hurtado's words, this type of space allows the construction of collaborations that connect knowledge with concrete historical, institutional and social processes. 

The keynote address was given by Julieta Lemaitre, magistrate of the Special Jurisdiction for Peace (JEP), whose career embodies precisely this crossover between academia and institutions. Her intervention addressed the relationship between citizenship and state, the ways in which communities build solutions in contexts of state absence and the role of justice in post-conflict scenarios, showing how institutions can both reproduce and transform inequalities. 

Below is an illustrated publication summarizing ‘Rebuilding’, Lemaitre's keynote lecture.:

View post on Instagram.

Thus, PEGS is conceived as a broader process of dialogue among countries of the global South, recognizing both their differences and the existence of shared structural challenges, including inequalities. It does so by articulating the work of centers or initiatives such as TREES in Colombia, the Center for Critical Imagination (Cebrap) in Brazil, the Applied Economics Program of El Colegio de México, Pathways Beyond Neoliberalism in the American University in Egypt, and the Southern Centre for Inequality Studies at Wits University in South Africa, which collaborate within the Emerging Political Economies (EPE) Network.  

As part of this effort to articulate a network of countries that share similar realities, the conference also reflects a commitment to amplify knowledge of these contexts. In Hurtado's words, the aim is to build agendas that are not “recipients of frameworks developed in other contexts, but interlocutors with their own voice and questions”. 

In the same vein, several of the panels highlighted the need to review the frameworks from which the problems of the global south are understood. “It is important to have a global south perspective for a global economy. Sometimes we think from a perspective that doesn't resonate with the way people in these countries live,” said Pierre Nguimkeu, professor of economics at Georgia State University and director of the Africa Growth Initiative at the Brookings Institution. 

An example of this type of discussion was the session on inequality, led by Leopoldo Fergusson, professor at the School of Economics of the Universidad de los Andes and co-founder of TREES, with the participation of Rodrigo Uprimny, senior researcher at Dejusticia and professor at the Universidad Nacional de Colombia, and Raymundo Campos and Aurora Ramírez Álvarez, professors at El Colegio de México.  

There, different dimensions of the structural gaps in the region and the challenges to address them from interdisciplinary approaches were discussed. As Uprimny pointed out, there is a disconnect between the field of human rights and the analysis of inequality: while normative frameworks have made progress in addressing discrimination between groups, “when one enters the field of social and economic inequality, the human rights movement is, in a certain sense, silent”. Along these lines, he stressed the need to connect rights more directly with the dynamics of inequality, not only as a theoretical problem, but also as a practical one. 

In this regard, Fergusson stressed that inequality is not limited to income differences, but produces deeper forms of social separation: “people with different income levels live so far apart that they end up being culturally distinct, as if they were different groups”. In this sense, he stressed that one of the central challenges is to think about these gaps not only in terms of distribution, but also in terms of rights and what it means to have an equal position in society, particularly in contexts such as those of Latin America. 

Labor informality was another of the central themes of the meeting. Laura Alfers, WIEGO's international coordinator, raised the discussion aligned with the idea that the frameworks do not coincide with the realities of the countries of the South: “60% of workers are in informal employment, something that could increase with technological change. Our labor institutions are still oriented around an idea imported from countries in the global north, developed in the 1940s and 1950s for labor markets that do not exist in the south.” 

In addition to the academic sessions, the conference included a research workshop, a teaching session and strategic spaces for articulation between centers in the global south that are part of the Emerging Political Economies Network, These meetings helped to consolidate a south-south network to promote those voices and questions of their own. These meetings contributed to consolidate a south-south network to promote these voices and questions.  

Throughout the event, the persistence of overlapping and mutually reinforcing structural gaps was highlighted, many of which go unnoticed because we tend to always look in the same places. In this context, the conference highlighted the need to broaden the analytical approach. In Hurtado's words: “to broaden our gaze, to look where we usually do not look and to accept that absence in the record [evidence or data] does not mean absence in reality”. 

See the video summary of the event.

Progress Report 2023-2025

Transforming reality requires changing the ideas that sustain it.

Therefore, in TREES we work to understand and transform inequalities based on rigorous knowledge. In this report we share what we have done between 2023 and 2025 in our three areas of work: Research, Teaching and Outreach. Here you will find our main achievements, learnings and challenges.

To view the report, click the button.

TREES Challenge: researching with communities transforms the way we understand inequalities

The TREES Challenge: Revealing Classism (2024-2025) brought together 120 undergraduate and master's students from different disciplines and from eight departments of the country in an immersive and collaborative experience aimed at designing strategies to strengthen social cohesion. Through participatory research methodologies, the teams explored attitudes, perceptions and practices related to classism in everyday contexts.

Encuentro presencial participantes del Reto TREES (2024-2025)

More than an academic exercise, the challenge opened a space to connect research, critical and ethical thinking and collective work. Rather than viewing communities as objects of study, the participatory research methodology promoted processes of dialogue and co-creation in which the people involved were able to reflect on classist attitudes and how they reproduce inequalities.

For Irma Flores, associate professor at the Faculty of Education of the Universidad de los Andes, one of the main contributions of this approach is that it allows “not only to bring a topic such as classism to a community, but also to talk to that community to see what they understand by classism”. From this perspective, participatory research not only produces knowledge: it also strengthens the social fabric and creates more horizontal relationships between researchers and communities.

Watch the reel and find out why participatory research was key to #RetoTREES

The challenge was aimed especially at students in training, precisely because this academic moment can open spaces for critical exploration and interdisciplinary creativity. As Paula Jaramillo, TREES teaching leader, points out, it is “a moment in life in which they can perceive the classisms around them and try not to reproduce them and also do something about them”.

The challenge was developed in six phases that guided the teams in the design and implementation of participatory action research in their own environments. Throughout the process, students identified and critically analyzed attitudes, relationships, perceptions and practices that reproduce - or challenge - dynamics of classism in everyday life. For the two editions of the Challenge, 2024 and 2025, the last phase culminated in a face-to-face meeting at the Universidad de los Andes, where the teams shared their findings, discussed their methodologies and reflected collectively.

Más allá de presentar resultados, el encuentro final permitió que los estudiantes conectaran la experiencia práctica con discusiones teóricas, metodológicas y éticas sobre cómo investigar junto a las comunidades. Como afirmó Blas Zubiría Mutis, mentor de la Universidad del Atlántico, durante el encuentro de 2024, el proceso permitió que los participantes “vivieran una experiencia investigativa concreta, utilizando unos parámetros establecidos por TREES y vinculándolos a la reflexión teórica, metodológica y epistemológica de la investigación participativa”. En la primera edición del Reto, equipos de la Universidad del Norte, la Universidad del Atlántico, El Colegio de México y la Universidad de los Andes desarrollaron preguntas de investigación, diseñaron metodologías y evaluaron junto a las comunidades si este tipo de investigaciones resultaban significativas y útiles para quienes participaban en ellas.

TREES 2025 Challenge certificate delivery.

The projects developed during the challenge also showed how classism manifests itself in everyday scenarios. One of the teams from the Universidad del Atlántico investigated dynamics of classism and microclassism in Alameda del Río, an urban housing project that brings together people from different socioeconomic contexts. Through observation, interviews and surveys, the team identified how everyday practices - such as drying clothes in windows or the presence of street vendors - generate tensions related to social status and perceptions of exclusivity.

The research showed how certain prejudices, towards informal activities and ways of inhabiting the space, reflect stereotypes and class barriers that generate tensions in coexistence. Beyond identifying these dynamics, the process allowed us to open conversations with the community about the ways in which these practices affect relations between neighbors and the perception of the “other” within the same territory. “Through surveys and interviews, we collected perceptions of exclusivity and prejudice towards informal activities such as street vending. These results will allow us to propose mitigation measures and foster understanding of classist attitudes,” explained Andrés Eduardo Miranda Pacheco, challenge participant and member of the #SOMOSUA team.

d data-instgrm-permalink=”https://www.instagram.com/p/DKIZhYmz23v/?utm_source=ig_embed&utm_campaign=loading” data-instgrm-version=”14″ style=” background:#FFF; border:0; border-radius:3px; box-shadow:0 0 0 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0,0.5),0 1px 10px 10px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0,0.15); margin: 1px; max-width:540px; min-width:326px; padding:0; width:99.375%; width:-webkit-calc(100% - 2px); width:calc(100% - 2px);”>

The Alameda del Río project showed how the challenge not only sought to produce data on classism, but also to generate processes of listening and collective reflection. This same logic ran through other projects of the TREES 2024 Challenge, such as the one developed by the SINPREJUICIOS team, which investigated the dynamics of classism in a beauty salon in Bogota. Through interviews and observation, the team identified how class differences between employees and clients produce derogatory attitudes towards workers.

“We discovered that personal attention, talking to the client, is considered an ‘implicit service’ that affects less talkative employees. We also found xenophobia and gender preferences among the stylists,” explained María Fernanda Blanco, a participant in the SINPREJUICIOS team. For the members of the project, one of the main lessons learned from the challenge was to understand the importance of humanizing people in the research and not seeing them only as data.

In addition, the Challenge served as a space for building networks among students from multiple regions and socioeconomic contexts, strengthening ties and collective learning. Valentina Gutiérrez, a student at Universidad de la Sabana, talks about what it meant to her to participate in the TREES 2025 Challenge.

“In this experience I understood the importance of each discipline, because each one brings a different look that enriches and transforms the way we understand reality. The most important teaching is that we must constantly challenge ourselves and question what attitudes or behaviors may be replicating classism, even when we are not fully aware of it.”

This reflection was also echoed in the experience of Verónica Rumaña Moreno, a student at the Universidad de los Andes and member of the team. Sentipensante Fabric. For her, one of the main lessons learned was to understand that classism does not always manifest itself in an obvious way. “Discriminatory behaviors are not necessarily expressed explicitly; many times they appear in subtle actions that have a profound impact on people,” she said.

data-instgrm-permalink=”https://www.instagram.com/p/DCC24D4TTNu/?utm_source=ig_embed&utm_campaign=loading” data-instgrm-version=”14″ style=” background:#FFF; border:0; border-radius:3px; box-shadow:0 0 0 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0,0.5),0 1px 10px 10px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0,0.15); margin: 1px; max-width:540px; min-width:326px; padding:0; width:99.375%; width:-webkit-calc(100% - 2px); width:calc(100% - 2px);”>

The teams' findings also revealed a major challenge: classism is often deeply normalized in everyday interactions, which makes it difficult to identify, investigate and even name. This is why the participatory research methodology takes on greater importance in the TREES Challenge, as it allows for the opening of spaces for listening and dialogue, and for the communities themselves to name and identify classism in their environments.

For more than five months, students not only develop research on different expressions of classism in their immediate environments, but also explore concrete ways to recognize and mitigate these attitudes that create inequality gaps in everyday life.

Watch here the TREES 2024 CHALLENGE coverage reel

Second TREES Research Grant Fund Workshop at the Universidad de los Andes

We have already held the first two workshops to strengthen the TREES research community. These two meetings brought together researchers who received financial support through the Grant Fund I and II calls for proposals. The researchers came together to share ideas, receive feedback and enrich their work.

Watch the video summary of the first Grant Fund workshop:

On May 7, 2025, Grant Fund II researchers were at the Universidad de los Andes with a common goal: to hear how their colleagues are studying inequalities from multiple disciplinary perspectives and contexts. The meeting served to share advances, discuss questions and strengthen an academic community committed to understanding inequalities in the global south.

During the event, researchers presented their ongoing projects and received feedback. Discussing ideas at an early stage allows them to improve approaches and strengthen analytical frameworks. “I really liked the comparative perspective. For example, one of the professors suggested we review classism versus caste in India, which we hadn't thought about,” commented Natalia Amaya, researcher at Fundación Prolongar.

Participants discussed the role of the state in land distribution, the reconstruction of the place of women in economic history, the dynamics of labor informality, the limits of social mobility, the multiple cultural dimensions of inequality and the challenges of applying models from the global north in Latin America.

The workshop was also an opportunity to strengthen cooperation between researchers from different disciplines. This approach seeks to broaden theoretical frameworks on inequality and generate useful evidence for public policies and citizen initiatives. “We want to look at inequality not only from its strictly economic dimension. This has produced a very rich mix of perspectives on its causes and consequences,” explains Leopoldo Fergusson, TREES Research Leader.

With some of these investigations already published, learn more about them in our research repository, With the Grant Fund III workshop underway, we confirm our commitment to contribute from rigorous knowledge to build more equitable societies.

Watch the video summary of the second Grant Fund workshop:

Juan Sebastián Lemos strengthens his research skills during his stay at Harvard


Thanks to the support of TREES, I had the opportunity to do an academic stay at the Harvard Graduate School of Education, an opportunity that marked both my professional and personal growth and that leaves me with experiences and learning that otherwise I would not have been able to live.

On a personal level, this experience transformed my perspective on what is possible. Studying at Harvard had never been an even imaginable option for me, but today it has become a real dream that I strive for at work every day. Living in another country, adapting to a new culture and communicating in a different language was a major challenge, as I had not had the opportunity to do so before. However, this was also an opportunity to broaden my knowledge, question my place in the world, the opportunities and privileges I have and strengthen my autonomy.

Professionally, the visit allowed me to make faster and more substantial progress on my research project. I attended seminars and classes taught by leading professors in educational research, which enriched my ideas and opened new paths for further expanding my research agenda. I participated in discussions with doctoral students who shared their experiences with me, which allowed me to better understand how academic careers are built in international contexts. I learned new research methodologies and approaches that complement my previous training and gained confidence in my ability to contribute, based on my experience, to discussions and decisions regarding the research project I am working on.

Finally, I was also able to establish links with students and researchers from different countries who share similar interests. At the same time, being surrounded by such skilled people in such a demanding environment was a challenge, but also a motivation to reflect on the quality of my education in the eyes of a future international projection. In short, this experience gave me more than knowledge: it gave me clarity about my vocation, new tools for my academic and professional development, and the impetus to keep striving.