Perspectives from the global south on environmental justice

Who are we referring to, what models are we questioning, and what other ways of relating to the environment can we imagine as a society?

These questions are fundamental to open conversations about sustainability, inequality and transformation. In Latin America, environmental conflicts are intertwined with histories of exclusion, dispossession and violence. For this reason, to speak of environmental justice requires going beyond conservation or efficiency. It entails, above all, examining the power structures that determine who decides, who benefits and who bears the costs of environmental degradation?.

From TREES we created this special of Environmental Justice to encourage these conversations and debates. We do so on the basis of this idea: environmental justice cannot be considered separately from social justice..

Rather than offering closed answers, this special opens up a space for exploration about the multiple ways in which economics, politics and daily life are intertwined in the territories of communities that have historically cared for nature.

To guide this tour, we have organized the contents as follows seven thematic pillars, conceived as different lenses for approaching the challenges of the socio-environmental crisis in Colombia, which does not impact everyone equally. While some populations bear the brunt of ecological degradation, others benefit from the same extractive models that produce it.

Key questions then arise: what historical and political structures of exclusion sustain these environmental inequalities? How can we think of a justice system that not only denounces asymmetries, but that replace, recognize and prioritize the affected communities, at the same time placing the care of nature in the center?

Through voices from research, journalism, social movements and public and private institutions, we propose a plural and critical conversation that recognizes the tensions, contradictions and also the possibilities of transformation in this historical moment.

Index

  1. What do we mean when we talk about environmental justice?
  2. Cases of environmental injustice
  3. Seven pillars for thinking about justice:
  4. Conclusions

1. What do we mean when we talk about environmental justice?

Environmental justice was not born as an extension of the traditional green agenda. While the latter tends to focus on nature conservation, ecosystem protection or sustainable development from an institutional perspective, environmental justice emerges as a social and political response to the profoundly unequal distribution of environmental damage. While some stocks bear the greatest burden of ecological damage, others benefit from the extractive models that generate them.

This inequality is not random: historically, impoverished and racialized communities have been more exposed to air, water and soil pollution, toxic waste and high-risk extractive or industrial projects. In many parts of the world, living next to a landfill, a refinery or a busy highway is not a matter of chance, but the result of political, economic and territorial structures that benefit some sectors while passing on to others the costs of environmental deterioration, with direct effects on physical and mental health and, in general, on the possibility of leading a dignified life.

This awareness of the unequal distribution of environmental damage began to become visible in the United States during the 1970s and 1980s. It was then that local communities - particularly those of African descent - organized to denounce how they were systematically the most affected by industrial pollution, toxic dumps and other forms of environmental degradation.

The concept of environmental justice emerged from the struggles of Afro-descendant communities in the United States. It is a notion that goes beyond the protection and conservation of the environment: it also demands equity, historical reparation and the active participation of communities in decisions that affect their territories.

The concept of environmental justice emerged from the struggles of Afro-descendant communities in the United States. It is a notion that goes beyond environmental protection and conservation: it also demands equity, historical reparations and the active participation of communities in decisions that affect their territories.

An emblematic example of environmental injustice is the case of Louisiana Energy Services (LES), which in 1989 obtained permission to build uranium enrichment plants in areas of high poverty and with a majority African-American population. This case, as Iván López explains in an article published in Eunomia. Journal on Culture of Legality, was key to the conceptual development of environmental justice, highlighting how decisions about environmental risk often fall disproportionately on racialized and impoverished communities.

Source: image taken from the article “Origin and evolution of the environmental justice movement.”.

Since then, the concept has transcended its local origins and has been taken up by environmental movements, multilateral organizations and affected communities in various regions of the world, especially in the global south. By the beginning of the 21st century, environmental justice was no longer limited to denouncing environmental racism in the United States: it had established itself as a critical tool for analyzing how the relationships between power, territory, inequality and the environment generate unequal impacts on different social groups.

Today, this lens is applied in such diverse contexts as:

  • The Brazilian Amazon, where indigenous peoples such as the Mundurukú resist illegal mining and hydroelectric dams that threaten their territories.
Photo by: https://www.dw.com/de/illegale-abholzung-und-bergbau-bedrohen-gemeinden-im-amazonasgebiet/a-45656372.
  • The urban peripheries in Latin America, as Inflammable Village in Buenos Aires oIztapalapa in Mexico City, where communities live exposed to air, water and soil contamination.
Photo by: https://elpais.com/internacional/2018/02/14/argentina/1518638112_243046.html.
Forum of: https://gacetadeiztapalapa.com.mx/en-iztapalapa-debemos-erradicar-los-tiraderos-a-cielo-abierto-fortalecer-al-personal-de-limpia-y-mejorar-la-infraestructura/.
  • The african deserts, as in Niger, where lithium mining has displaced communities.
Photo by: https://es.euronews.com/green/2024/12/12/el-lado-oscuro-de-la-mineria-de-litio-en-nigeria-pobreza-infantil-y-explotacion-laboral.
  • The Southeast Asia, where megaprojects such as the Xayaburi Dam in Laos or the oil palm plantations in Indonesia have involved land dispossession, deforestation and loss of biodiversity.
Taken from: https://www.infobae.com/america/the-new-york-times/2020/02/17/el-paraiso-natural-que-esconde-la-muerte-a-causa-de-la-construccion-de-represas/.
Taken from: https://www.worldwildlife.org/descubre-wwf/historias/cumbre-amazonica-debe-resultar-en-compromiso-coordinado-y-efectivo-de-los-paises-para-la-conservacion-del-bioma-y-el-desarrollo-sostenible.

2. Ways in which environmental injustice is expressed

Environmental inequalities are not limited to the local level: they also manifest themselves on a global scale. The global South - understood as those regions historically marginalized from economic and political power, such as Latin America, Africa and much of Asia - bears the brunt of environmental degradation, despite having contributed much less to its causes.

According to the World Air Quality Report of IQAir, nine of the ten countries with the worst air quality are in the global south, emissions, while the major historical emitters - such as the United States, Germany and the United Kingdom - do not appear on this list. This disparity reveals a structural pattern of unequal distribution of environmental burdens and responsibilities.

The more developed countries have externalized part of the environmental costs of their growth to other geographies.

According to this report, 9 of the 10 countries with the worst air quality are in the global south:

  1. 🇹🇩 Chad.
  2. 🇧🇩 Bangladesh.
  3. 🇵🇰 Pakistan.
  4. 🇨🇩 Democratic Republic of Congo.
  5. 🇮🇳 India.
  6. 🇹🇯 Tajikistan (the only country on the list from the global north).
  7. 🇳🇵 Nepal.
  8. 🇺🇬 Uganda.
  9. 🇷🇼 Rwanda.
  10. 🇧🇮 Burundi.

On this inequality, the report “Places and Spaces. Environments and Children's Well-being”.” from UNICEF warns that many nations of the global north ensure optimal conditions for their future generations at the cost of intersecting environmental degradation in other regions of the world.

This can be seen, for example, in the way in which many countries in the global North have reduced their local environmental impacts by shifting polluting activities, waste or extractive demands to other regions. Although internally they manage to guarantee better living conditions - such as cleaner air, access to green areas or strict regulations - their ecological footprint is projected onto the global south, where the burdens associated with resource extraction, industrial production or waste disposal are concentrated.

Some examples illustrate these dynamics:

  • At Central America, In addition, indigenous and farming communities are facing increasingly extreme droughts and storms as a result of climate change.
  • At Colombia, The U'wa people, who inhabit páramo territories in the northeastern part of the country, have resisted oil expansion for decades. For this community, the land is sacred and oil is “the blood of the Earth”, so their defense articulates spiritual, environmental and political dimensions.
  • At Africa, The agrofuel boom has increased the price of food, with serious repercussions on local food security.
  • At Asia, The massive production of palm oil in Indonesia has led to deforestation and a significant loss of biodiversity.

In fact, some strategies promoted by international organizations, which in principle seek to mitigate climate change, have generated significant tensions. One example is REDD+ (Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation), a mechanism that promotes the conservation of tropical forests as a way of sequestering carbon, allowing countries or companies to offset their emissions through forestry projects in the global south.

However, although international organizations such as the UN, the World Bank and donor governments from the Global North have promoted REDD+ as a climate solution, in multiple contexts this mechanism has been questioned by indigenous and Afro-descendant communities in countries such as Colombia, Brazil and Peru, who denounce that it has been implemented without prior consultation or full participation. These communities have pointed out that the mechanism may reinforce inequalities in the access, control and distribution of benefits derived from forests. In some cases, as reported by Amazonian indigenous organizations grouped in COICA, the projects have provoked displacement or restricted traditional ways of life in the name of externally imposed conservation.

In TREES we made this video with the participation of the following people Juan Camilo Cardenas, Professor and researcher at the School of Economics of the Universidad de los Andes, and Julia Miranda, Representative to the Chamber of Deputies and former Director of Colombia's National Parks. In the conversation, they analyze the carbon credit market and the current scope and limitations of REDD+ mechanisms in Colombia. You can watch it here:

The socio-environmental crisis in Colombia does not impact everyone equally. While some populations bear the brunt of ecological damage, others benefit from the extractive models that generate it. How can this paradox be explained? What structures of exclusion continue to reproduce environmental inequality in the country? And, above all, what would it mean to move towards an environmental justice that redresses, recognizes and prioritizes the affected communities, while putting the care of nature at the center?

In the face of these challenges, various strategies, debates, and bets emerge aimed at reconfiguring the relationship between society and nature from fairer and more sustainable perspectives. In this special issue we propose to map some of these key questions:

  • How is it possible to promote an ecological transition that does not reproduce or amplify existing social inequalities?
  • What models of development, governance and knowledge production are currently in dispute in this process?
  • What is the role of the different social, political and economic actors in shaping a more just future?

To address these tensions, we organize the content into seven thematic pillars, each of which offers a particular entry point for thinking about the links between environmental justice, knowledge and collective action.

3. Seven pillars for thinking about environmental justice

Pillar 1: Inequalities in everyday life: the case of hurricane Iota

In order to show how communities experience the impacts of climate change unevenly, in this special we analyze the case of Hurricane Iota in Providencia. In November 2020, this phenomenon -the first category 5 hurricane to hit the archipelago- left a deep mark on the lives of the Raizal community. This event was more than a natural tragedy: it meant a rupture in the infrastructure, economy and local culture. To better understand these consequences from a community perspective, we spoke with June Marie Mow, director of the Providence Foundation, who shared how the island has faced this process of reconstruction and resistance.

The consequences were devastating: homes destroyed, vegetation razed and a community facing material losses, emotional effects and painful transformations in their way of life. The subsequent reconstruction process also revealed profound inequalities: many decisions were made without local participation, houses were built in risky areas and key cultural practices, such as the collection of water in cisterns, were lost. For those who live on the island, the impact of the hurricane persists in the ways in which the territory is inhabited, decided and reconstructed today.

To tell this story, we designed an illustrated infographic. See it here:

The case of Providencia clearly illustrates climate injustice: historically excluded territories, with low levels of public investment and limited institutional capacities, disproportionately face the effects of climate change. It was not only the force of Hurricane Iota that devastated the island, but also the pre-existing structural conditions that hindered preparedness, response and recovery.

According to the analysis Multiple IDB Colombias, In the “Vulnerable Colombia”, to which regions such as San Andrés and Providencia belong, more than 58 % of the population has at least one unsatisfied basic need, and only 36.8 % have access to quality water. In contrast, departments such as Bogota, Antioquia or Valle del Cauca -integrants of the “Consolidated Colombia”- register an access to quality water of 93.7 %, together with much lower levels of multidimensional poverty.

This contrast makes it possible to analyze how structural conditions determine the way in which an emergency is experienced. A comparison with more robust territories in terms of infrastructure, basic services and institutional capacity could show notable differences in the speed of response, access to humanitarian aid and the possibility of reconstruction.

Even so, the community does not only start from its own deficiencies, but also from its own capacities. In Providencia, organizations such as the Providence Foundation have worked to strengthen local ownership of risk management and promote active participation in reconstruction processes.

In contexts where the State proposes external solutions - often without prior consultation and without connection to the cultural and environmental reality - resilience is not something that is imposed from outside: it is strengthened in the territory, based on collective memory and organization.

Pillar 2: Research on environmental justice from the global south

For TREES, it is essential to disseminate rigorous knowledge that broadens the view of inequalities from the global south. The challenge is not only to study the problems, but to do so based on innovative frameworks, questions and methodologies that respond to specific contexts, involve the affected communities and dialogue with global debates.

In this line, the economist María Alejandra Vélez, a tenured professor in the School of Economics at the Universidad de los Andes, has researched the tensions that arise when carbon markets and REDD+ projects are implemented in territories with low state capacity and little community participation. In her studies on REDD+, Vélez Lesmes and colleagues have pointed out that tensions emerge between those who promote these projects and the communities involved. These tensions, in many cases, result in profound questioning by local leaders about the governance of their territories. Although not documented in formal interviews, they reflect the concern that these communities often express when information and participation are relegated.

On the other hand, a recent study, led by Carolina Castro, The REDD+ projects implemented in the Colombian Pacific region had significant effects on the reduction of deforestation and illicit crops in Afro communities, compared to those that did not participate in these programs.

In this Research Film, produced as part of this special, Professor Vélez explains in detail the REDD+ mechanisms, as well as their current scope and limitations. Watch it here:

From another perspective, economist Juan Camilo Cárdenas, professor at the School of Economics of the Universidad de los Andes, has spent more than two decades designing experimental methodologies to understand and address complex socio-environmental conflicts. In cases such as the Santurbán páramo, In this project, their work has consisted of recreating -through games and simulations- the dilemmas faced by farmers, miners, government officials and urban dwellers regarding water use and the impacts of mining. The objective is not to offer a technical formula to resolve the conflict, but to create spaces of trust, empathy and collective action.

These investigations raise questions about who defines the problem, whose voices are heard and what are the consequences of intervening without understanding local realities.

At a time when technical solutions and global commitments to a more sustainable world abound, this pillar underscores the need to produce knowledge that engages in dialogue with the territories and with those who directly experience the consequences of the socio-environmental crisis, while being relevant to the global debate.

Pillar 3: From the classroom: teachers teaching environmental justice

How to teach environmental justice in classrooms dominated by numbers, graphs and supply and demand curves? The pedagogical resource, Climate change to the classroom: an experimental exploration of the competitive marketplace., designed by Juan Camilo Cárdenas, Karen Castro and Sergio Díaz proposes a way forward: transforming the classroom into a living car market, with sellers, buyers and contracts that, after several rounds, reveal not only who wins and who loses, but also who bears the hidden costs.

The simulation begins as a conventional competitive market: students negotiating prices and maximizing profits. The real lesson, however, comes when the environmental costEach transaction involves a collective discount that everyone must pay, whether they have participated or not.

The initial enthusiasm then turns into debate: Is it fair for everyone to bear the same cost? What does it mean to negotiate in a world traversed by externalities such as climate change?

This pedagogical shift turns theory into experience. The classroom ceases to be an abstract space and becomes a laboratory of environmental justice, where the tension between efficiency and equity, between individual interest and collective responsibility, is put to the test. Reflecting on their experiences, students discover that economic decisions are never neutral: they always redistribute benefits and costs, and almost always do so unequally.

By making visible the hidden costs and their unequal distribution, this type of experience opens conversations on the need to rethink the assumptions that guide the contemporary economy. In this way, they contribute to imagining models that are less indifferent to the damage they generate and more attentive to equity in the allocation of responsibilities, indicating that the transformation towards fairer and more sustainable economies is not only desirable, but necessary.

Download the resource

Pillar 4: The role of business in environmental justice

The business sector is one of the actors that most influences the configuration of territories. Its influence is not limited to its economic capacity, but is also manifested in the consequences of its decisions on land use, access to natural resources and the transformation of territorial dynamics - that is, the social, cultural, ecological and economic relationships that sustain life in a place. This impact is particularly evident in rural areas, extractive frontier areas or regions with high biodiversity, where business operations can profoundly redefine ways of living, producing and deciding.

Therefore, the role of the private sector in environmental justice is not only restricted to mitigating damages. It implies transforming its ways of operating and explicitly assuming responsibility for the social and ecological effects of its activities. As Laura Barajas, researcher at Fundación Ideas para la Paz, points out in the report The potential of companies to transform territories (2023): “companies should not only intervene to reduce impacts, but also actively participate in building collective well-being in the places where they operate”.

This implies that companies recognize that sustainability is not just a technical issue or a reputational strategy, but a fundamental ethical dimension of business development.

In Latin America, the discussion on corporate sustainability has evolved towards a vision that recognizes social, ethical and environmental responsibility as an inseparable part of organizational management. As Miguel Muriel, professor at SEK International University, Faculty of Social and Legal Sciences, points out, in a regional analysis on sustainability, In this regard, “sustainable business is absolutely compatible with social and economic development”, and demands a transformation of traditional production models towards processes “aligned with the well-being of society” and the “preservation of the environment”.

This approach - increasingly adopted by companies aware of the current environmental context - proposes that efficiency and environmental justice are not separate worlds, but practices that must be integrated from the very beginning of business planning.

One of the companies that has sought to move in this direction is Grupo Argos, a conglomerate or holding company focused on the infrastructure sector, with investments in key sectors such as energy (Celsia), cement (Cementos Argos), road and airport concessions (Odinsa) and urban development. Its activity has direct impacts on soil, water and biodiversity, but also on the communities where it operates. In recent years, it has begun to implement sustainability strategies focused on emissions reduction, circular economy and territorial dialogue.

For this special, we talked to Ana María Uribe, sustainability manager of Grupo Argos, to learn how a company with a high territorial impact in Colombia is rethinking its strategies from a perspective of environmental sustainability and social responsibility. Here you can learn more:

Advances in corporate sustainability coexist with business models that generate significant social and environmental impacts, particularly in historically marginalized territories. This panorama raises questions that invite a deeper analysis:

  • Under what conditions can a business strategy be said to be sustainable when it involves the intensification of the use of common goods such as water or land?
  • What criteria would be relevant to assess an organization's environmental commitment beyond regulatory compliance or the publication of voluntary reports?
  • What institutional, economic and organizational transformations would be necessary for sustainability to translate into practices consistent with environmental justice principles?

Pillar 5: Opening the conversation: the role of journalism

What role does it play in building environmental justice?

That was the question that guided our conversation with Andrés Bermúdez, who has demonstrated how environmental journalism is not only a tool for information or disclosure, but an exercise in democratic monitoring: a practice that observes, questions and follows up on power - institutional, corporate and political - to demand transparency, accountability and protection of collective rights, especially in contexts of high socio-environmental conflict.

Throughout his career, Bermúdez has documented deep tensions between megaprojects presented as sustainable and the rights of the communities facing their impacts.

An emblematic case is the carbon credit project in Cumbal, Nariño, investigated by Rutas del Conflicto. There it found that one of the indigenous communities involved -despite inhabiting the territory and carrying out conservation work- was unaware of the existence of the project, the bond transactions already carried out and even the economic benefits it should have received. The investigation revealed serious failures in social safeguards, conflicts of interest between executing and auditing companies, as well as weak state supervision.

As Bermúdez warns, if it is not rigorously regulated and the informed participation of the people is not guaranteed, the carbon market can reproduce dispossession schemes under the language of sustainability.

Read more about our conversation with Andrés Bermúdez here:

Reports such as Bermúdez's illustrate how journalism can exert legitimate pressure on economic and political actors who make decisions in the name of the environment.

From this perspective, environmental investigative journalism is not an external narrator, but an actor that influences the decisions that shape territories and development models. By making impacts, inconsistencies and conflicts visible, it contributes to making public policies and business strategies face a better informed, more critical citizenry with greater capacity to demand accountability.

This task is especially relevant in Latin America, where environmental conflicts are intertwined with historical inequalities. In this context, environmental journalism not only informs: it opens cracks in the dominant consensuses, questions the strategic use of green language and broadens the public debate on the meaning of a just transition.

Pillar 6: Learning with others: environmental justice in the classroom

Although environmental justice is often associated with technical debates or social mobilizations, it is also constructed in educational spaces. More and more university students are actively participating in this conversation, not only in the classroom, but also through field work, critical analysis and collaborative production of knowledge with communities in their territories.

An example of this is the exercise carried out by students from Doing Economics 2, a class of the School of Economics of the Universidad de los Andes, in partnership with Pollen Just Transitions, a Colombian think tank specializing in just, inclusive and viable energy transitions. There, the students evaluated and made visible the impact of one of the projects of Pollen Just Transitions in La Guajira.

Their participation transcended the academic dimension to become a contribution to the transformation of narratives on development and climate change. One of the most valuable results was the decision to focus the analysis on life stories, a strategy that made it possible to narrate the impacts of the project from the perspective of those who experience them on a daily basis.

Find out how this initiative was experienced here:

The participation of students in research and exchange processes with communities not only enriches their academic training, but also transforms the ways in which we understand knowledge and its relationship with the territories. In a context such as the Latin American one, working with communities allows us to question the traditional hierarchies of knowledge and to recognize that solutions do not come only from laboratories, databases or theoretical models.

Dialogue with local actors and field work thus become central tools for building critical thinking, rooted in reality and attentive to the tensions that cross the territories.

These types of training practices also invite us to rethink the role of the university. More than a space for the transmission of technical knowledge, it can be a bridge between diverse knowledge: that of the sciences, but also that of communities, territories and bodies.

Betting on a university that listens, collaborates and is ethically involved in the processes it investigates is a way to broaden the frameworks of environmental justice. It is not only a matter of including local cases in the courses, but of generating real channels of dialogue, in which questions are not formulated from above, but emerge from the encounter between different ways of understanding the world and inhabiting the environment.

Pillar 7: Thinking about public policies from an environmental justice perspective

Talking about environmental justice in the area of public policies implies transforming the way we conceive development, well-being and territorial management. It is not enough to incorporate environmental criteria into government plans: it is important to recognize that social, economic and ecological inequalities are deeply intertwined, and that it is not possible to move towards environmental justice without confronting these inequalities from the very design of policies.

With this in mind, TREES has teamed up with Let's reimagine, a collective that promotes spaces for dialogue, collaboration and action among academics, artists, activists, businesses, governments and citizens, to disseminate a public policy recommendation with a focus on environmental justice. This proposal arises from the Territorial Dialogues on Inequality, The environmental dimension did not appear as an isolated issue, but as an integral part of the social, economic and political conditions that shape the territories.

From these dialogues emerged the document “24 policy recommendations for building equity in Colombia”.”. There, a route is proposed to address these tensions from the food systems. The proposal starts from a provocative question: why is there hunger in fertile territories?

Based on this questioning, the recommendation argues that rethinking the way in which food is produced, distributed and accessed can be a way to address exclusion in the Colombian countryside and move towards a just ecological transition that recognizes local knowledge, territorial autonomy and the interdependence between social and environmental justice.

The recommendation proposes policies aimed at strengthening production, transformation and consumption networks with a territorial approach, in which peasants, indigenous peoples and Afro-descendant communities play a leading role. It is not only a matter of producing food, but also of guaranteeing autonomy, decent rural employment and territorial health.

Some of these projects are already underway in different regions of the country. This video presents initiatives such as the Agroecological Plan of Nariño or the CIPAVE project in Valle del Cauca, which exemplify how it is possible to build alternatives from the territories, articulating sustainability, social justice and local knowledge.

This type of bets show that doing environmental justice from public policies does not mean limiting oneself to managing risks or responding to climate emergencies when it is already too late. It implies conceiving the State not only as an apparatus that intervenes from the center, but as an actor that listens, accompanies and co-constructs with those who inhabit the territories. It implies establishing more horizontal relationships between institutions and communities, and recognizing that sustainability is not imposed from above: it is woven with time, trust and reciprocity.

In contexts marked by historical inequalities, environmental justice is also democracy. A democracy that is not reduced to the act of voting, but is exercised on a daily basis, when communities can decide on the use of their lands, on access to water, on how and with whom to produce their food.

A democracy that broadens the voices that count and redistributes power so that decisions affecting the territories are not made far away or without consultation, but with the effective participation of those who sustain life in them.

4. Conclusion: weaving social and environmental issues together

This special opened a conversation on the multiple paths from which environmental justice can be thought of. This journey proposes to understand environmental justice not as an isolated issue, but as an invitation to transform our ways of living, deciding and coexisting with the territories, from the recognition of historical inequalities and active listening to those who face them every day.

What emerges here is not a closed formula, but a mosaic of practices and learning that question the traditional hierarchies of knowledge and power around environmental issues.

To strengthen the conversation, we had a forum in which Julia Miranda, representative to the Chamber; Argenis García Valencia, sociologist and Afro-Colombian leader; Juana Hoffman, Technical Director of Amazon Conservation Team Colombia; and Juan Camilo Cárdenas, co-founder of TREES, discussed the tensions and mechanisms that promote or limit environmental justice. You can watch the live broadcast here:

Throughout this special, we illustrate the connections between environmental justice, social justice, epistemic justice and climate justice. These connections are based on the recognition that conservation is not enough if benefits and costs are not redistributed; that protecting ecosystems also implies protecting those who inhabit and care for them; and that there can be no talk of sustainability while maintaining the exclusion of voices and experiences that have been historically silenced. Rather than offering unique answers, this conversation invites us to think collectively about how to build transitions that not only reduce environmental impacts, but also expand rights, recognize diverse knowledge and transform the way we relate to the territories.

This is how he put it Juana Hoffman, lawyer and technical director of Amazon Consevation Team Colombia, in our conversation:

In this sense, environmental justice requires structural transformations in policies and in the distribution of power, but also an everyday ethic that understands the future not as a fixed destiny, but as a space under constant construction and debate.

In this sense, environmental justice requires structural transformations in policies and in the distribution of power, but also an everyday ethic that understands the future not as a fixed destiny, but as a space under constant construction and debate.

Environmental justice is not a point of arrival or a closed agenda: it is an open conversation, nourished by the exchange between actors, disciplines and territories. Many of the experiences gathered here show that this process is already underway. What remains is to continue listening, learning and acting with collective responsibility.

Bibliography